Publications & Preprints
Preprints under review
Diana F, Folz J, Shjak-Shie E, Hortensius, R., Kret, ME. (2025). Physiological Synchrony Predicts Reduced Reciprocity Only in Face-to-Face Interactions, PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/n85t3_v3
Diana F, Kawahara M, Tanaka A, Shalvi S, Hortensius R, Kret, ME. Differences in Dishonesty Toward Humans and Artificial Agents: The Role of Agent Type and Pupil Size, PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/8nqsy_v2
2026
van Beek H, Boda D, Diana F, Held R, Hogenhuis A, Moore-Lorusso A, Hortensius R. (2026). Seven Questions on Perceiving and Understanding Other Minds, Behaviour, 1568-539. *all authors contributed equally to this work
DOI:10.1163/1568539X-bja10345
2025
Diana F, & Kret ME (2025). First predict, then bond: Rethinking the function of mimicry from prediction to affiliation in human and non-human animals, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews,168, 105950.
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105950
Diana F, Hortensius, R., Kret, ME. (2025) Can Robots Trust Us? Neuropsychophysiological Insights into Honesty Towards Artificial Agents. In Proceedings of the 2025 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI ’25). IEEE Press, 1838–1840.
DOI: 10.1109/HRI61500.2025.10974055
2024
Diana F, Cañamero L, Hortensius R, & Kret ME (2024). Merging sociality and robotics through an evolutionary perspective. Science Robotics
DOI: 10.1126/scirobotics.adk6664
2023
Diana F, Juárez-Mora OE, Boekel W, Hortensius R, Kret ME. (2023) How video calls affect mimicry and trust during interactions. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B378:20210484.v. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0484
Diana, F., Kawahara, M., Saccardi, I., Hortensius, R., Tanaka, A., & Kret, ME. (2023). A Cross-Cultural Comparison on Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Towards Artificial Agent. International Journal of Social Robotics,
DOI: 10.1007/s12369-022-00917-7 5